🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Graveyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation details a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

One resident remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Along the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working overseas. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families want additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others argue the moment for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.